By Kaleb Hill
Invasive
species are a dangerous and devastating problem for the environment and public
health. Invading alien species in the United States cause major environmental
damages and losses adding up to almost $120 billion per year (Update on…). When
hearing the term invasive species, people often think of Burmese pythons, fire
ants, and feral hogs. Although these animals are devastating to the
environment, none of them compare to the damages of feral cats. Free-roaming
and feral cats yearly kill hundreds of millions, perhaps as many as a billion,
native North American birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and fish (Coleman
JS, et al. 1997). The Lindsay Museum of Walnut Creek, Calif, a full-service
wildlife rehabilitation facility, received 5,669 small mammals, birds, and
reptiles between January 1 and September 14, 2003. Of these, 24% (1,050) of
birds, 12% (143) of mammals, and 15% (11) of reptiles were presented because of
cat-related injuries or conditions (Coleman JS, et al. 1997). Many people who
see cats attacking or predating wildlife think nothing of it, and many may even
support this behavior. Not only do these animals damage the native wildlife by
predation, but they also compete with other predators by decrease prey
availability.
Cats
are predators by nature, and predation is a natural threat to all animals, but
the pressure that wildlife receive from cat predation can be much greater. The
term feral means in a wild state, but it is complicated with cats as this might
not be the case. Many cats are free roaming pets, meaning that they are cared
for by an owner who provides food and shelter but allows the cat to move around
freely outside. Food and shelter are also provided for many feral cats by cat
lovers. This causes cats to potentially reach a higher level of fitness than a
wild animal that is always in search of resources and shelter. Feral cats and
the programs that foster their free-ranging existence do not serve the welfare
of individual wild animals or wildlife populations, can cause an alteration of
basic biological processes, and have serious potential negative impacts on biodiversity
and recovery of endangered and sensitive species in many landscapes (Dickman
1996). Having free ranging and feral cats creates a grey area when deciding how
to handle this problem.
One of
the “solutions” being used to address this problem is “Trap-Neuter-Return”
(TNR), a process of trapping cats and surgically sterilizing the animals to
prevent them from reproducing. In the world of TNR, unless a stray cat has a
collar or is microchipped, it is very difficult to distinguish from a truly
feral animal (Jessup, 2004). This process is very ineffective and raises
ethical concern of our actions to release invasive predators into the environment.
Although the trapped cats cannot reproduce they are released to continue wreaking
havoc on wildlife for the rest of their life. Despite articles claiming
success, a follow-up studyh on one of the largest and most active TNR programs
in California has revealed no demonstrable effects at the population level after
nearly a decade of effort (Chappell, 1999). Many suggest that releasing these
animals is a violation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), due to the fact
that cats can and do kill endangered wildlife.
Other
solutions have to be explored, during a time when biodiversity is severely threatened
we cannot afford to waste any more time or money on a process and opinion that
is not working. Changing public opinion is a very important start in this
process, educating people about the hazards of feeding and sheltering feral
cats is the first step to correcting this problem. Keeping pet cats on your
property needs to become mandatory to protect wildlife and other pets. Through
the process of TNR many free roaming cats get relocated to different areas and
lost, which is an important reason to keep track of your pets. We must accept
that euthanasia and poisoning could be a more effective and cost efficient
solution, these pests need to be treated and viewed the same way as any other
rodent, hog, snake, insect, or other wildlife that people have deemed
acceptable to kill. If cats get a free pass, why shouldn’t all other invasive
species get protection?
Coleman JS, Temple SA, Craven SR. Cats and wildlife: a
conservation dilemma. Madison, Wis: Cooperative Extension Publications, 1997.
Dickman CR. Overview of the impacts of feral cats on
Australian native fauna. Canberra, Australia: Australian Nature Conservation
Agency, 1996; 92.
Jessup David A. The Welfare of Feral Cats and Wildlife.
Animal Welfare Forum 2004. Vol 225,
Chappell MS. A model for humane reduction of feral cat
populations. Calif Vet 1999; Sep/Oct
Pimentel David, Zuniga Rodolfo, Morrison Doug. Update on the
Environmental and Economic Costs Associated with alien-invasive species in the
United States. Ecological Economics, 2004; Vol 52
No comments:
Post a Comment