Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Saving lives or caging animals





Kaleb Hill

Living in a cage doesn’t seem right to anyone, but you have probably seen a pet or animal behind bars that you have fallen in love with. Many people don’t agree with zoo’s, seeing the facilities as evil organizations restricting animals from being free in order to cash in on their misery. As a former zookeeper, hearing this I can only wonder, would these people feel so strongly about the wellbeing of these animals if they never saw one in a cage? Many of these animals have to be in their cage for the protection of their species. Many people from urban developed countries could not understand the wonderful inspiring awe that is felt from seeing such great animals such as rhinos, elephants, and crocodiles if zoos did not exist because they would not see these animals in the wild. Seeing a 2 dimensional picture does not do justice to the size and persona of these animals, standing in front of them for the first time you can get a feeling like a child going to their first 3-D movie. These feelings can inspire the next generation of zoologist or conservationist are worth so much on their own, but this isn’t the only value of a zoo.
Zoos started to become established in the United States in the late 19th century, although husbandry was still inadequate, the path towards modern zoos was starting. By the 20th century restrictions on the wild animal trade began to develop. With restrictions making obtaining animals more difficult this resulted in zoos beginning breeding programs to supple other facilities with healthy captive bred animals. Captive bred animals not only allowed for some profit in selling animals to other facilities but also ensured that they would keep their stock of animals, but it also attracted visitors to see baby monkeys, tigers, and other animals. This in itself has benefited the welfare of many animal species that are not taken from the wild and allow people to enjoy the wonders of seeing these species. Collection-based institutions owe their existence to nature (Miller et al). Although there has been a rough dark history with keeping wild animals in captivity, zoos have come a long way to become better facilities and contribute to conservation. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums was founded in 1924, a nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of North American zoos in the areas of education, conservation, and the wellbeing of captive animals. The AZA sets regulations on the captive management of captive animals, requiring a set of standards to be reached and maintain that are higher than required by law for a facility to become accredited. (HISTORY & PURPOSE OF MODERN ZOOS, 2016)
            Despite the standards zoos have reached, some people still insist that zoos are bad places for animals. People often times don’t realize that zoos contribute to conservation and many animals such as the white rhino only have individuals on the planet left thanks to zoos. Many zoos also contribute to animal populations by releasing captive bred animals back into the wild. The AZA established a computerized database called the Annual Report on Conservation and Science (ARCS) which is a database to track various projects such as an individual’s origin, breeding history, and genetic relationships. This database is an important tool for keeping track of the numbers and health of a captive population in terms of its viability to return to the wild or to be used in breeding programs. Several examples of the successful work zoos have contributed to conservation can be seen such as the California condors, which were on the brink of extinction in the 1980’s, collaborations with the San Diego Zoo and other organizations were able to release captive bred individuals increasing their population from 22 birds to over 240 on the wild and roughly 200 in captivity. There are many other examples of reintroduction success, but most importantly AZA facilities allow for funding to examine problems occurring in wild populations, in 2015 alone AZA facilities spent $186,000,000 towards field conservation, and $30 million on scientific research. This funding allows us to diagnosis and address threats to wild populations such as disease, pollution, and poaching. (Aza.org, 2018)
             

Aza.org. (2018). Conservation Success Stories in AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums. [online] Available at: https://www.aza.org/aza-news-releases/posts/conservation-success-stories-in-aza-accredited-zoos-and-aquariums

MILLER, B., CONWAY, W. and READING, R. (2004). Evaluating the Conservation Mission of Zoos, Aquariums, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Museums. Conservation Biology, 18(1), pp.86-93.

HISTORY & PURPOSE OF MODERN ZOOS. (2016). [ebook] Woodland park zoo. Available at: https://www.spl.org/Documents/audiences/CHI/2016GRC_activities/1_TimelineActivity%20-PurposeofModernZoos.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment